The Dick Family Conflict Showcases Taxation Problems in Jersey

Most people are well aware of the controversy regarding tax havens and tax avoidance around the world. Even so, looking at specific cases, such as that of the Dick family, can help showcase the extent of the problems. These show how people take advantage of these loopholes in tax havens.

Background on the Dick Family Conflict

The head of the Dick family, John W. Dick, was born in Canada as a Mennonite and is now a multimillionaire tycoon who is 82 years old and lives in Jersey. His home has been the St. John’s Manor for over 40 years, and this is frequently referred to as the most elegant house in Jersey. He was also the Seigneur of St. John until recently, a feudal title.

Now, John Dick is in a legal feud with his daughter, Tanya Dick-Stock, and her husband, Darrin Stock, who is an American businessman.

The Conflict

According to Dick-Stock, her father defrauded the family trusts. Importantly for the conversation about tax havens, these trusts are offshore vehicles that the family uses to avoid paying taxes. As Dick-Stock is the beneficiary of these trusts, and they contain tens of millions of pounds, a significant amount is at stake.

Dick disputes the allegations and says that Dick-Stock and her husband are unreliable. Additionally, Dick’s lawyers argue that Dick-Stock cannot bring a legal case against Dick in this matter since the receiver should control the litigation. Dick’s legal team also claims that Dick-Stock is the only beneficiary of the trusts to have a problem. The team also contends that the entire family has been fraud victims.

The Fraud They Agree On

One of the few things that Dick and Dick-Stock agree on in this conflict is that St. John’s Manor was used to secure a £6.5 million loan fraudulently. They claim that PanTrust, a Dick family trust trustee and an obscure company dedicated to offshore services, was part of the fraud. They then allegedly misappropriated the loan in question from HSBC Jersey.

More Conflict

The difference is that Dick-Stock argues that Dick played a role in the fraud, along with PanTrust. As such, Dick-Stock and Stock are presenting themselves as whistleblowers.

However, their arguments are weakened by past instances of unpaid debts and lawsuits that hurt their credibility. There is also the fact that the evidence Dick-Stock gave contradictory statements made under oath, and that she has a history of changing stories and evidence.

The Family Is Known for Lack of Transparency

This is far from the first time that the Dick family has been connected to tax havens and potential financial fraud. Dick’s divorce from his second wife in the early 90s brought to light Compendium, a Jersey-based trust that was a trustee of a Dick trust. A Miami-based lawyer, Lawrence Freeman, had used this same Compendium to launder money for drug runners and the mafia.

Why It Matters

Although the Dick family conflict could be seen as just an internal family feud, it also provides a glimpse into the use of offshore trusts. Specifically, it showcases how high net worth individuals can use these trusts for fraudulent purposes. After all, both Dick and Dick-Stock agree that massive fraud occurred in Jersey.

Transparency Is a Significant Concern

Those who use the Dick conflict as an example of a more significant problem point to the issue of transparency. Based on the conflict, it is clear that the Dick family is not aware of everything that occurs with their assets. If even the owners of the assets are unaware, it seems farfetched to imagine that tax authorities and regulators would be able to discover what is happening. This likely leaves the system open to abuse by drug cartels, mobsters, and kleptocrats.


Recent posts

4 Consequences of US Tax Reform

Over the course of the past several weeks, President Trump has consistently called for tax reform, and the Senate Finance Committee has scheduled hearings on both business and individual tax reform.

More >>>